Dear attendee, if you would like to ask any questions to the authors of the paper, please add a new comment in the following section and we will notify them.
Video layer
2 Comments
Anne Marte Gardenier
on 2024-07-03 at 13:19
Dear Roxanne van der Puil,
Thank you for your presentation. I wonder, could you provide some more examples of social media design that reflects the deliberative democracy theory as you present it?
Thank you for the research.
While someone coined, or at least used, the term, post-factual attitude, there seems to be an area to be examined in accepting “post factual” being on equal standing with the traditional reliance on fact or reason. I sense that you already point in that direction, but maybe on the margins of your argument, or not as centrally as potentially possible. Use of terms as “false” or “incorrect” indicates reference to other grounds besides those which post-factualists profess. This is where I find your research “reassuring” in maintaining its grounding upon reason and against the deluge of sources standing on equal footing.
I truly appreciate and endorse the conclusive argument you make that expression of interest (and the individual or group kinship print in its various forms) is an opportunity rather than a challenge.
Dear Roxanne van der Puil,
Thank you for your presentation. I wonder, could you provide some more examples of social media design that reflects the deliberative democracy theory as you present it?
Thank you for the research.
While someone coined, or at least used, the term, post-factual attitude, there seems to be an area to be examined in accepting “post factual” being on equal standing with the traditional reliance on fact or reason. I sense that you already point in that direction, but maybe on the margins of your argument, or not as centrally as potentially possible. Use of terms as “false” or “incorrect” indicates reference to other grounds besides those which post-factualists profess. This is where I find your research “reassuring” in maintaining its grounding upon reason and against the deluge of sources standing on equal footing.
I truly appreciate and endorse the conclusive argument you make that expression of interest (and the individual or group kinship print in its various forms) is an opportunity rather than a challenge.